# Deflationary Access Fees

<figure><img src="/files/rHlzdK3kxIkFbYUsfHKc" alt=""><figcaption></figcaption></figure>

OpenVision integrates deflationary mechanics directly into platform usage to drive long-term\
token scarcity and alignment between utility and burn.

* **Burn Mechanics:** A portion of every paid API inference or training job is paid in  \
  $VISION is burned automatically, reducing the circulating supply and anchoring value to  \
  usage.
* **Dynamic Fee Multiplier:** The burn rate can be dynamically adjusted via DAO  \
  governance based on network traffic, token supply, and ecosystem maturity.
* **USDC Surcharge Model:** Enterprises paying in USDC incur a premium unless  \
  holding a required $VISION balance, encouraging on-chain participation, and  \
  Reducing selling pressure.
* **Periodic Burn Proposals:** The DAO can propose and execute additional token burns  \
  burns from protocol revenue or unused treasury allocations.

These mechanics ensure that as model adoption scales, so too does the deflationary\
pressure on $VISION, making it a self-reinforcing digital commodity tied to AI\
infrastructure demand.


---

# Agent Instructions: Querying This Documentation

If you need additional information that is not directly available in this page, you can query the documentation dynamically by asking a question.

Perform an HTTP GET request on the current page URL with the `ask` query parameter:

```
GET https://openvision-2.gitbook.io/whitepaper/usdvision-token/deflationary-access-fees.md?ask=<question>
```

The question should be specific, self-contained, and written in natural language.
The response will contain a direct answer to the question and relevant excerpts and sources from the documentation.

Use this mechanism when the answer is not explicitly present in the current page, you need clarification or additional context, or you want to retrieve related documentation sections.
